[blml] Correction of a revoke

[gesta at tiscali.co.uk]

Grattan Endicott<gesta at tiscali.co.uk
[following address discontinued:
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk]
***********************
"In nature there are neither 
rewards nor punishments - 
there are consequences.
              [R.G.Ingersoll]
 +++++++++++++++++++++++
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Peter Eidt" <PeterEidt at t-online.de>
To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at amsterdamned.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: [blml] Correction of a revoke


> From: Konrad Ciborowski 
> 
> [snip] 
> 
>> Am I supposed to ask my opponents
>> to show me their hands every single time I claim?
>> If they say "what for?" am I supposed to call the
>> TD?
>> 
>> It hardly seems practical. And it would annoy 
>> the hell out of everybody if I started doing it.
> 
> Peter:
> What about Law 66D ??
> 
> "After play ceases, the played and unplayed cards 
> may be inspected to settle a claim of a revoke, or 
> of the number of tricks won or lost; [...]"
> 
+=+ Er, well, Peter, what about it? If a revoke is found 
at that stage the Director's action conforms to the law 
operative at the stage at which the revoke is found. 
                                        ~ Grattan ~   +=+