[blml] concession

[Jerry Fusselman]

On Jan 2, 2008 6:00 PM, John Probst <john at asimere.com> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "WILLIAM SCHODER" <schoderb at msn.com>
> To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at amsterdamned.org>; "blml"
> <blml at rtflb.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 6:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [blml] concession
>
>
> > Last try.
>
> snip
>
> >
> > How to rule/adjudicate?  In my opinion I would not let the claimant depart
> > from his claim. Supervised play continues as mandated, and the TD must
> > determine if any exposed cards or actions by defenders provide UI.
> >
>
> seems blindingly obvious to me.  What do i know, I'm just an egg.  John
>

Wonderful!  If it is so blindingly obvious to you, perhaps you can
answer my question about that paragraph.  DALB asked a similar
question, I believe.  I'll repeat my question from earlier today:

Can you tell us a little about how play is supervised?  (For example,
what does the director say to the table before play continues?  Also,
which hands does he look at?  When should he consider previous tricks
or the auction or the defender's convention cards?)

Jerry Fusselman