[blml] concession

[WILLIAM SCHODER]

I suggest you (John) don't bite on this bait.  Would end up in the longest 
thread this august body has ever produced. Just go ahead and be an egg and 
run your most successful club using the Laws and understanding their intent.

Kojak


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry Fusselman" <jfusselman at gmail.com>
To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at amsterdamned.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [blml] concession


> On Jan 2, 2008 6:00 PM, John Probst <john at asimere.com> wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "WILLIAM SCHODER" <schoderb at msn.com>
> > To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at amsterdamned.org>; "blml"
> > <blml at rtflb.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 6:58 PM
> > Subject: Re: [blml] concession
> >
> >
> > > Last try.
> >
> > snip
> >
> > >
> > > How to rule/adjudicate?  In my opinion I would not let the claimant 
> > > depart
> > > from his claim. Supervised play continues as mandated, and the TD must
> > > determine if any exposed cards or actions by defenders provide UI.
> > >
> >
> > seems blindingly obvious to me.  What do i know, I'm just an egg.  John
> >
>
> Wonderful!  If it is so blindingly obvious to you, perhaps you can
> answer my question about that paragraph.  DALB asked a similar
> question, I believe.  I'll repeat my question from earlier today:
>
> Can you tell us a little about how play is supervised?  (For example,
> what does the director say to the table before play continues?  Also,
> which hands does he look at?  When should he consider previous tricks
> or the auction or the defender's convention cards?)
>
> Jerry Fusselman
>
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
>