[blml] L86D [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Konrad Ciborowski
cibor at poczta.fm
Fri Jan 4 15:23:59 CET 2008
> Konrad Ciborowski:
>
> >It all makes no sense to me. I'd appreciate clarification
> >on what this particular law is supposed to mean
>
> Richard Hills:
>
> North-South bid and make a difficult grand slam for +2210.
>
> When the board arrives at the other table the king of
> hearts is face up in the West slot, preventing replay of
> the board.
>
> Due to the Law 86D "(and should do so when that result
> appears favourable to the non-offending side)" the TD is
> no longer required to give the non-offending side a mere
> +3 imps, but can instead award a juster +13 imps.
>
So my guess was right - the first part of the sentence
in the 86D should read
"In team play when the Director is about to award an
artificial adjusted score..."
Is that correct?
--
Konrad Ciborowski
Kraków, Poland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mamy worek pelen prezentow. Te prezenty sa dla Ciebie.
Sprawdz >> http://link.interia.pl/f1cbf
More information about the blml
mailing list