[blml] L86D [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

Konrad Ciborowski cibor at poczta.fm
Fri Jan 4 15:23:59 CET 2008


> Konrad Ciborowski:
> 
> >It all makes no sense to me. I'd appreciate clarification
> >on what this particular law is supposed to mean
> 
> Richard Hills:
> 
> North-South bid and make a difficult grand slam for +2210.
> 
> When the board arrives at the other table the king of
> hearts is face up in the West slot, preventing replay of
> the board.
> 
> Due to the Law 86D "(and should do so when that result
> appears favourable to the non-offending side)" the TD is
> no longer required to give the non-offending side a mere
> +3 imps, but can instead award a juster +13 imps.
> 

So my guess was right - the first part of the sentence
in the 86D should read

"In team play when the Director is about to award an 
artificial adjusted score..."

Is that correct?




-- 
Konrad Ciborowski
Kraków, Poland

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mamy worek pelen prezentow. Te prezenty sa dla Ciebie.

Sprawdz >> http://link.interia.pl/f1cbf





More information about the blml mailing list