[blml] concession

[Sven Pran]

> On Behalf Of John Probst
.................
> > Example with five tricks left to play:
> >
> > 1: OK, you get three (also a claim of two as defined in Law 68A)
> >
> > 2: I get two (also a concession of three as defined in Law 68B1)
> >
> > 3: You get three and I get two
> >
> > 4: I get two and you get three
> 
> If partner immediately objects, play continues. They're all the same.
> John

That is exactly my opinion as well, but Tim apparently thinks otherwise? 

He seems to say that when a player begins his statement with the word "I
get" (or words to that effect) then it is primarily a claim for which Law
68B2 cannot apply. If I have understood him correct his opinion is that play
can only continue under Law 68B2 with examples 1 and 3 above.
 
Regards Sven