[blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Adam Wildavsky]

At 9:03 AM +0000 1/11/08, Grattan wrote:
>  >>>12C1(e)(ii) is to be interpreted such that the
>>>>words "had the irregularity not occurred" are
>>>>inserted between "probable" and the period
>  >>>ending the sentence.

>+=+ Did the ACBL regulations also add these words
>into the 1997 Law 12C2? - or is it a change of policy?

It's new. The 1997 version could have been interpreted either way, 
and as far as I know the ACBL LC never took an official position on 
the matter.

As you no doubt recall, I don't believe the sentence has any meaning 
without the additional phrase.

-- 
Adam Wildavsky  adam at tameware.com  http://www.tameware.com