[blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook

[Matthias Berghaus]

Sven Pran schrieb:
>> On Behalf Of Herman De Wael
>>     
>>> .................
>>>       
>> And isn't that "indicating that 4NT was not
>> Blackwood"?
>>     
>
> You are always returning to your understanding of "indicate that an error
> has been made" in Law 20F5 and refuse to see that this understanding can be
> false.
>
> Now please answer this question:
>
> I make a call for which my partner gives an incorrect explanation.
>
> Partner then makes his call, and no explanation from me is requested.
>
> Am I now permitted to make my next call in accordance with our partnership
> agreements if this call not only "indicates" but even clearly demonstrates
> for everybody that partner made an error in his explanation of my previous
> call?
>   

Hehe. Good one, Sven.

Best regards
Matthias

> Sven 
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
>
>
>