[blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook

[Hirsch Davis]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Herman De Wael" <hermandw at skynet.be>
To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at amsterdamned.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook


>
>> However, I'm offering you a different choice.  Here, you may be giving
>> additional information to opponents that you're having an auction 
>> breakdown.
>> But that's not against any Law.  So, the choice is now, break the Laws 
>> about
>> giving correct explanations (illegal), or give opponents information that
>> you and partner are not on the same wavelength (legal).
>>
>
> Only true if your bracketed (illegal) were true. It is not.
>

??

Please explain how dWs avoids violation of the following:

L20.F.1
L20.F.4
L40.B.6.a
L72.A
L72.B.3
L73.C
L73.D.2

Hirsch