[blml] A strory with a conclusion

Konrad Ciborowski cibor at poczta.fm
Thu Jan 17 15:41:43 CET 2008


> [HdW]
> 
> And yet, Grattan, there is L20F5. This law explicitely states which
> infraction the WBF considers the worst of the two you mention.
> 
> [DALB]
> 
> Herman, we have explained to you over and over and over again why L20F5
> does
> not mean what you think it means. 

But repeating your argument over and over and over again doesn't
make it any stronger, does it?

I'm afraid that your argument boils down to "HdW is invalid
because I say so".




-- 
Konrad Ciborowski
Kraków, Poland

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bedac w toalecie zagrala w ... 

Sprawdz >>  http://link.interia.pl/f1cd5 




More information about the blml mailing list