[blml] 40B3?

[Alain Gottcheiner]

Eric Landau a écrit :
> There are two ways to look at the Law, which is why we are having  
> this debate over interpretation.  One interpretation produces  
> Morton's fork situations in which a player cannot continue to play  
> out a deal without breaking one law or another.  The other  
> interpretation raises no such difficulty.  One could argue from the  
> principle of reductio ad absurdum that that is a sufficiently  
> definitive difference to dictate which interpretation must be  
> correct.  Alain subtly assumes his conclusion, as it is only if we  
> accept the "Morton's fork" interpretation that the question of  
> "priority" between "forbidden" actions arises.
>
>   
Indeed. But up to now, L73B1, and the ensuing MF situation, still exists.
It was claimed it shouldn't apply, it was said (you just did it) life 
would be easier if it wouldn't, but this ain't proof.

BTW, I also claim life would be easier using dWS principles, in some 
cases at least. MI could lead to technical problems. But the confusion 
from incoherent explanations nearly always will.

Best regards

 Alain