[blml] 40B3?

[Sven Pran]

> On Behalf Of Herman De Wael
> > ..............
> > Rest assured that I will rule against anybody I find violating laws.
> >
> > The difference here is that HDW has in advance announced his intention
> > to violate laws that require him to give correct information to
> > opponents.
> >
> > I deal differently with contestants violating laws accidentally or
> > because of ignorance and those that violate laws intentionally.
> > 
> >
> 
> We're talking current laws, are we? 

Indeed we are.

> I would not dream of using DWS when it's being outlawed.

According to my interpretation of the current laws (See Law 81C2) DWS is
already outlawed.

> What is the difference between me, who breaks the MI laws because of
> L20F5, and someone else, who does it because he's been told not to
> give UI?

You have demonstrated your intention to break the laws deliberately while
the other person is assumed to break them accidentally or from ignorance
until otherwise indicated. 

> In fact, you would only rule against me; and you would do it because
> you believe my interpretation to be wrong. Now that's a very strong
> basis for giving me a penalty that you would not give to someone else!

Are you trying to read my mind or predict my action, and in doing so
reaching a result contrary to the truth?

Sven