[blml] 40B3?

[richard willey]

On 1/18/08, Herman De Wael <hermandw at skynet.be> wrote:

> Oh yes, that would be cheating. So I won't that. But I may do
> something else: claim that I misbid. It has become a regular occurence
> for Directors to rule on the actions rather than on the intentions.
> "You do exactly as a cheat would do" says John Probst. So in future
> all players who claim misbid should be treated as DWS cheats.
>
> And that still does not answer my question. What is the penalty.
> Remember that the normal penalty is one I can live with. I believe the
> alternative (with the UI restrictions) to be worse than the MI
> penalty. So how are you going to rule. Ah yes, David said: 90IMP penalty.

For what its worth, I don't agree with the proposed 90 IMP Proceedural Penalty

Personally, I'd recommend yanking your Director's license.  I think
that this is a much better match for the the infractions that you're
committing.  More over, I think that it would be a more effective
deterrent.

If this doesn't work and we see repeat offenses, expulsion for
cheating would seem warranted






-- 
"First they came for the verbs, and I said nothing because verbing
weirds language. Then they arrival for the nouns, and I speech nothing
because I no verbs."

Peter Ellis