[blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options

[gesta at tiscali.co.uk]

Grattan Endicott<gesta at tiscali.co.uk
[following address discontinued:
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk]
*******************************
"Judge not the play before the play be done"
                     [Sir John Davies 1569-1626]
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Willner" <swillner at nhcc.net>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 2:27 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options


>> From: <gesta at tiscali.co.uk>
>> +=+ Did the ACBL regulations also add [weighted scores] 
>> into the 1997 Law 12C2? - or is it a change of policy?
> 
> The ACBL has never adopted weighted scores and 
> will not do so now, at least as I read the ACBL LC 
> decisions recently posted.
> 
+=+ I am puzzled. My question had nothing to 
do with weighted scores. I was asking whether 
the ACBL's treatment of 1997 Law 12C2 was 
to add 'had the irregularity not occurred' after 
'the most unfavourable result that was at all probable'
(as they have decided to do in the 2007 laws) ?
                                        ~ G ~   +=+