[blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options

[Stefanie Rohan]

>  I was asking whether
> the ACBL's treatment of 1997 Law 12C2 was
> to add 'had the irregularity not occurred' after
> 'the most unfavourable result that was at all probable'
> (as they have decided to do in the 2007 laws) ?
>
I don't understand this. Doesn't this mean that a player who takes advantage 
of UI can at worst break even?

Stefanie Rohan
London, England