[blml] Good or bad bridge citizenship

[Wayne Burrows]

On 24/01/2008, Jerry Fusselman <jfusselman at gmail.com> wrote:
> A question:
>
> You are the NOS, and you are quite sure that you have been damaged,
> but subsequently, you goof up the hand and expect to be ruled to not
> be playing bridge.  The director, or committee, who sees all four
> hands, would have played it better.  Also assume that you are having a
> really bad round.
>
> You consider calling the director at this time, but the result would
> likely be only to adjustment the OS's score, and besides, you are not
> going to scratch.  Is calling the director in this case good, bad, or
> neutral bridge citizenship?

neutral

>
> Also, is not calling the director for these reasons (i.e., it won't
> help you win anything) good, bad, or neutral bridge citizenship?

bad

Wayne