January 2008 Archives by author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Jan 1 00:07:25 CET 2008
Ending: Thu Jan 31 22:44:12 CET 2008
Messages: 1349

• [blml] Law 58B2 revisited   Robin Barker
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Robin Barker
• [blml] 40B3?   Robin Barker
• [blml] lacuna; was RE: dWs/MS   Robin Barker
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Lawsand 2007Laws - Part Two   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Lawsand 2007Laws - Part Two   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] Bible   Adam Beneschan
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] I will end quartered   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] And now for something completely different   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Matthias Berghaus
• [blml] re claim   Brian
• [blml] re claim   Brian
• [blml] concession   David Burn
• [blml] concession   David Burn
• [blml] re claim   David Burn
• [blml] re claim   David Burn
• [blml] re claim   David Burn
• [blml] concession   David Burn
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   David Burn
• [blml] Correction of a revoke [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   David Burn
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007Laws - Part Two   David Burn
• [blml] L27   David Burn
• [blml] L27   David Burn
• [blml] concession   David Burn
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   David Burn
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   David Burn
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   David Burn
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   David Burn
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   David Burn
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   David Burn
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   David Burn
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   David Burn
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   David Burn
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   David Burn
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   David Burn
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   David Burn
• [blml] irrelevant   David Burn
• [blml] Bible   David Burn
• [blml] Bible   David Burn
• [blml] Bible   David Burn
• [blml] Zonal Laws Committees   Wayne Burrows
• [blml] Good or bad bridge citizenship   Wayne Burrows
• [blml] ABF seminar - Law 27C [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Wayne Burrows
• [blml] ABF seminar - Law 27C [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Wayne Burrows
• [blml] ABF seminar - Law 27C [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Wayne Burrows
• [blml] Wording of the laws   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] 40B3?   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] Wording of the laws   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] L86D   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007Laws - Part Two   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] from Vitold   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] L86D [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] from Vitold   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] L27   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] L13Db - why artificial?   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Konrad Ciborowski
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Write or speak   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Groucho   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Herman's bible posting   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] L42A1 question   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Bible   Hirsch Davis
• [blml] Opening Lead   Nancy T Dressing
• [blml] Opening Lead   Nancy T Dressing
• [blml] Opening Lead   Nancy T Dressing
• [blml] opening lead   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] opening lead²   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] irrelevant   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] Vienna   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] something for Sven   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] requesting that no calls be alerted   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] dWs/MS   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] Story (I refuse to write "strory") with a conclusion and truth   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] Groucho   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] Herman's bible posting   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] R.I.P.?   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] heretical suggestion   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] old posting   Jeff Easterson
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Peter Eidt
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Peter Eidt
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Peter Eidt
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Peter Eidt
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Peter Eidt
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Peter Eidt
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Peter Eidt
• [blml] question about L31B   Peter Eidt
• [blml] =question about L31B   Peter Eidt
• [blml] Regulating Authority and bridge vacation   Peter Eidt
• [blml] New Rules vs Old   Peter Eidt
• [blml] New Rules vs Old   Peter Eidt
• [blml] L60A question   Peter Eidt
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jeff Ford
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] concession   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] concession   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] concession   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] 2007 Laws - RA's options.   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007Laws - Part Two   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Opening Lead   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] If it ain't broke... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Announce [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] ACTION NEEDED! L27C1   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] irrelevant   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] irrelevant   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Fw: DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Fw: DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Fw: DWS - internal inconsistencies inlawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Bible   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Bible   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Bible   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Good or bad bridge citizenship   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] =question about L31B   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Bible   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Is a pass that denies 3-card support alertable in the ACBL?   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] LA   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] LA   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] LA   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] LA   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] LA   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] San Francisco cases posted   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] San Francisco cases posted   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Double disclosure   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Double disclosure   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] Bible   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] ABF seminar - Law 27C   Jerry Fusselman
• [blml] How careful with words was the DSC?   Robert Geller
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Robert Geller
• [blml] Definition of "artificial call" - misprint and possible shortening   Robert Geller
• [blml] Definition of "trick"   Robert Geller
• [blml] Definition of "trick" [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Robert Geller
• [blml] ACTION NEEDED! L27C1   Robert Geller
• [blml] ACTION NEEDED! L27C1   Robert Geller
• [blml] ACTION NEEDED! L27C1   Robert Geller
• [blml] irrelevant   Robert Geller
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Robert Geller
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Robert Geller
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   Robert Geller
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   Robert Geller
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   Robert Geller
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   Robert Geller
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Robert Geller
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Robert Geller
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Robert Geller
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Robert Geller
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Robert Geller
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Robert Geller
• [blml] question about L31B   Robert Geller
• [blml] =question about L31B   Robert Geller
• [blml] =question about L31B   Robert Geller
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Robert Geller
• [blml] Regulating Authority and bridge vacation   Robert Geller
• [blml] WBFLC consultation   Robert Geller
• [blml] New Rules vs Old   Robert Geller
• [blml] New Rules vs Old   Robert Geller
• [blml] New Rules vs Old   Robert Geller
• [blml] L42A1 question   Robert Geller
• [blml] L45Cb4 questions   Robert Geller
• [blml] L42A1 question   Robert Geller
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Robert Geller
• [blml] New Rules vs Old   Robert Geller
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Robert Geller
• [blml] L55A ambiguity?   Robert Geller
• [blml] L60A question   Robert Geller
• [blml] L55A ambiguity?   Robert Geller
• [blml] Wording of the laws   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Opening Lead   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Opening Lead   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Opening Lead   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] LA   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] concession   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Announce   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] LA   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] concession   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Turn the other cheek. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] I will end quartered   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] ACTION NEEDED! L27C1   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] I will end quartered   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Write or speak   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] irrelevant   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] 40B3?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] 40B3?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] 40B3?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] irrelevant   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] irrelevant   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] LA   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] dWs/MS   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] LA   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Unplayable Board   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] what's the limit of "failed to protect" ?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] LA   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] LA   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Good or bad bridge citizenship   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] LA   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] LA   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Opening Lead   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] 40B3?   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Bible   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Double disclosure   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Double disclosure [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Double disclosure [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] ABF seminar - Law 27C   Alain Gottcheiner
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   David Grabiner
• [blml] Law 12 A 1.   Guthrie
• [blml] Fw: claim   Guthrie
• [blml] Wording of the laws   Guthrie
• [blml] Penalize or Rectify?   Guthrie
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] Legal experimentation   Guthrie
• [blml] Penalize or Rectify?   Guthrie
• [blml] Penalize or Rectify?   Guthrie
• [blml] A story with a conclusion   Guthrie
• [blml] concession   Guthrie
• [blml] Definition of "trick" [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] concession   Guthrie
• [blml] Announce   Guthrie
• [blml] Announce   Guthrie
• [blml] Announce   Guthrie
• [blml] Announce   Guthrie
• [blml] Announce   Guthrie
• [blml] Penalize or Rectify?   Guthrie
• [blml] Announce   Guthrie
• [blml] The high priority of disclosure.   Guthrie
• [blml] Turn the other cheek. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] ACTION NEEDED! L27C1   Guthrie
• [blml] Glossary   Guthrie
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Guthrie
• [blml] Global warming?   Guthrie
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Guthrie
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options.   Guthrie
• [blml] Write or speak   Guthrie
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] Write or speak   Guthrie
• [blml] irrelevant   Guthrie
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   Guthrie
• [blml] Fw: DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] Fw: DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] WBFLC consultation   Guthrie
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] Bible   Guthrie
• [blml] WBFLC consultation   Guthrie
• [blml] WBFLC consultation   Guthrie
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Guthrie
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Guthrie
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Guthrie
• [blml] L42A1 question   Guthrie
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Guthrie
• [blml] New Rules vs Old   Guthrie
• [blml] LA   Guthrie
• [blml] LA   Guthrie
• [blml] LA   Guthrie
• [blml] LA   Guthrie
• [blml] LA   Guthrie
• [blml] Double disclosure   Guthrie
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Guthrie
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] ABF seminar - Law 27C [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Guthrie
• [blml] Nothing more remains to be said   Guthrie
• [blml] re claim   Eric Landau
• [blml] re claim   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] re claim   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] Opening Lead   Eric Landau
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two   Eric Landau
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Eric Landau
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007Laws - Part Two   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] Opening Lead   Eric Landau
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007Laws - Part Two   Eric Landau
• [blml] 2007 Laws - RA's options.   Eric Landau
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Eric Landau
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two   Eric Landau
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007Laws - Part Two   Eric Landau
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007Laws - Part Two   Eric Landau
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Lawsand 2007Laws - Part Two   Eric Landau
• [blml] L27   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] L13Db - why artificial?   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Eric Landau
• [blml] Opening Lead   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] Penalize or Rectify?   Eric Landau
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] LA   Eric Landau
• [blml] If it ain't broke... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] LA   Eric Landau
• [blml] concession   Eric Landau
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Eric Landau
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Eric Landau
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Eric Landau
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Eric Landau
• [blml] LA   Eric Landau
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Eric Landau
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Eric Landau
• [blml] 40B3?   Eric Landau
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Eric Landau
• [blml] 40B3?   Eric Landau
• [blml] 40B3?   Eric Landau
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Eric Landau
• [blml] 40B3?   Eric Landau
• [blml] 40B3?   Eric Landau
• [blml] irrelevant   Eric Landau
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Eric Landau
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Eric Landau
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Eric Landau
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Eric Landau
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Eric Landau
• [blml] what's the limit of "failed to protect" ?   Eric Landau
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Eric Landau
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Eric Landau
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Eric Landau
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Eric Landau
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Eric Landau
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Eric Landau
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] LA   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure   Eric Landau
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Eric Landau
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Double disclosure   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] LA   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   Eric Landau
• [blml] ABF seminar - Law 27C   Eric Landau
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Eric Landau
• [blml] ABF seminar - Law 27C   Eric Landau
• [blml] Bible   John R. Mayne
• [blml] L27   Tony Musgrove
• [blml] Revoking   Tony Musgrove
• [blml] LA   Tony Musgrove
• [blml] LA   Tony Musgrove
• [blml] New Rules vs Old   Tony Musgrove
• [blml] LA   Tony Musgrove
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tony Musgrove
• [blml] LA   Fearghal O'Boyle
• [blml] LA   Fearghal O'Boyle
• [blml] LA   Fearghal O'Boyle
• [blml] Double disclosure   Petrus Schuster OSB
• [blml] New Law 27   Martin Oyston
• [blml] Tartan or Weak   Martin Oyston
• [blml] Tartan or Weak   Martin Oyston
• [blml] Opening Lead   Martin Oyston
• [blml] Opening Lead   Martin Oyston
• [blml] Opening Lead   Martin Oyston
• [blml] Tartan or Weak   Martin Oyston
• [blml] Opening Lead   Martin Oyston
• [blml] ACTION NEEDED! L27C1   Noel & Pamela
• [blml] ACTION NEEDED! L27C1   Noel & Pamela
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Roger Pewick
• [blml] War of the Worlds- was A strory with a conclusion   Roger Pewick
• [blml] re claim. CORRECTION.   Sven Pran
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] re claim   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] re claim   Sven Pran
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Sven Pran
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] Opening Lead   Sven Pran
• [blml] Opening Lead   Sven Pran
• [blml] Opening Lead   Sven Pran
• [blml] Opening Lead   Sven Pran
• [blml] Opening Lead   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] opening lead   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 58B2 revisited   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] Law 58B2 revisited [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] LA   Sven Pran
• [blml] LA   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] LA   Sven Pran
• [blml] LA   Sven Pran
• [blml] concession   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] ACTION NEEDED! L27C1   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Sven Pran
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Sven Pran
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] And now for something completely different   Sven Pran
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] 40B3?   Sven Pran
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Sven Pran
• [blml] 40B3?   Sven Pran
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Sven Pran
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   Sven Pran
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   Sven Pran
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   Sven Pran
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   Sven Pran
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   Sven Pran
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   Sven Pran
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Sven Pran
• [blml] what's the limit of "failed to protect" ?   Sven Pran
• [blml] what's the limit of "failed to protect" ?   Sven Pran
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Sven Pran
• [blml] R.I.P.?   Sven Pran
• [blml] LA   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure   Sven Pran
• [blml] New Rules vs Old   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] L42A1 question   Sven Pran
• [blml] L45Cb4 questions   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] LA   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Opening Lead   Sven Pran
• [blml] Opening Lead   Sven Pran
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Sven Pran
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Sven Pran
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Sven Pran
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Sven Pran
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] L55A ambiguity?   Sven Pran
• [blml] L60A question   Sven Pran
• [blml] ABF seminar - Law 27C [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Bible   Sven Pran
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Sven Pran
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   John Probst
• [blml] concession   John Probst
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] Opening Lead   John Probst
• [blml] Penalize or Rectify?   John Probst
• [blml] concession   John Probst
• [blml] Opening Lead   John Probst
• [blml] Law 58B2 revisited   John Probst
• [blml] LA   John Probst
• [blml] Announce   John Probst
• [blml] LA   John Probst
• [blml] And now for something completely different   John Probst
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] irrelevant   John Probst
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options.   John Probst
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   John Probst
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options.   John Probst
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B, (2) L11   John Probst
• [blml] dWs/MS   John Probst
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B   John Probst
• [blml] LA   John Probst
• [blml] Unplayable Board   John Probst
• [blml] lacuna; was RE: dWs/MS   John Probst
• [blml] question about L31B   John Probst
• [blml] =question about L31B   John Probst
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] old posting   John Probst
• [blml] Lingua Franca   John Probst
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you arenot sure[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are notsure [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   John Probst
• [blml] re claim   Ed Reppert
• [blml] re claim   Ed Reppert
• [blml] re claim   Ed Reppert
• [blml] re claim. CORRECTION.   Ed Reppert
• [blml] re claim. CORRECTION.   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Ed Reppert
• [blml] re claim   Ed Reppert
• [blml] re claim   Ed Reppert
• [blml] re claim   Ed Reppert
• [blml] re claim   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Correction of a revoke [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Law 12 A 1.   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Correction of a revoke [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Opening Lead   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Opening Lead   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Opening Lead   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] concession   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Opening Lead   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Opening Lead   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Opening Lead   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Opening Lead   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Opening Lead   Ed Reppert
• [blml] opening lead   Ed Reppert
• [blml] opening lead   Ed Reppert
• [blml] opening lead²   Ed Reppert
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] LA   Ed Reppert
• [blml] LA   Ed Reppert
• [blml] LA   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Announce   Ed Reppert
• [blml] LA   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Announce   Ed Reppert
• [blml] LA   Ed Reppert
• [blml] concession   Ed Reppert
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] LA   Ed Reppert
• [blml] LA   Ed Reppert
• [blml] LA   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Turn the other cheek. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Ed Reppert
• [blml] ACTION NEEDED! L27C1   Ed Reppert
• [blml] ACTION NEEDED! L27C1   Ed Reppert
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Ed Reppert
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Rubber Laws? (was ACTION...) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Ed Reppert
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Ed Reppert
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Ed Reppert
• [blml] irrelevant   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Zonal Laws Committees   Ed Reppert
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Ed Reppert
• [blml] irrelevant   Ed Reppert
• [blml] irrelevant   Ed Reppert
• [blml] irrelevant   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Ed Reppert
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007Laws - Part Two   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Lawsand 2007Laws - Part Two   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] Revoking   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] I will end quartered   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] I will end quartered   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] And now for something completely different   Jean-Pierre Rocafort
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy and a new problem   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Announce [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Groucho   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Story (I refuse to write "strory") with a conclusion and truth   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Story (I refuse to write "strory") with a conclusion and truth   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] LA   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] what's the limit of "failed to protect" ?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] LA   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] WBFLC consultation   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] LA   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Overtricks   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] WBFLC consultation   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Lawsand 2007Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] LA   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Law 58B2 revisited [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Opening Lead   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Opening Lead   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] 2007 Laws - RA's options.   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] 40B3?   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] LA   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Bible   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Double disclosure   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Lingua Franca   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] old posting   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] LA   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Double disclosure   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Double disclosure   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] LA   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] LA   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Lingua Franca   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Nothing more remains to be said   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Psyches and misbids   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] Psyches and misbids [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Stefanie Rohan
• [blml] concession   WILLIAM SCHODER
• [blml] concession   WILLIAM SCHODER
• [blml] EBU White Book & WBF LC minutes [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   WILLIAM SCHODER
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   WILLIAM SCHODER
• [blml] L27   WILLIAM SCHODER
• [blml] L27   WILLIAM SCHODER
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   WILLIAM SCHODER
• [blml] Law 58B2 revisited [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Penalize or Rectify?   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] New Rules vs Old   Harald Skjæran
• [blml] Law 58B2 revisited   Andre Steffens
• [blml] Law 58B2 revisited   Andre Steffens
• [blml] List of BLML Abbreviations   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] BLML Usage statistics   Henk Uijterwaal
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Francis WOLFF
• [blml] re claim. CORRECTION.   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] re claim   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] concession   Herman De Wael
• [blml] concession   Herman De Wael
• [blml] concession   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] LA   Herman De Wael
• [blml] If it ain't broke... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] If it ain't broke... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] If it ain't broke... [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Turn the other cheek. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] I will end quartered   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Herman De Wael
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Fw: DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Story (I refuse to write "strory") with a conclusion and truth   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Story (I refuse to write "strory") with a conclusion and truth   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Herman De Wael
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook[SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Story (I refuse to write "strory") with a conclusion and truth   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] 40B3?   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Advice on explaining when you are not sure [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Lingua Franca   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Lingua Franca   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] Bible   Herman De Wael
• [blml] concession   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] concession   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] concession   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] concession   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] concession   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] concession   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] concession   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Law 58B2 revisited [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Law 58B2 revisited [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options.   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] Is a call that "does not exist" alertable or explainable?   Tim West-Meads
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Adam Wildavsky
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Adam Wildavsky
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Adam Wildavsky
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Adam Wildavsky
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options.   Adam Wildavsky
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options.   Adam Wildavsky
• [blml] WBFLC consultation   Adam Wildavsky
• [blml] San Francisco cases posted   Adam Wildavsky
• [blml] Nashville Case 14   Adam Wildavsky
• [blml] San Francisco cases posted   Adam Wildavsky
• [blml] San Francisco cases posted   Adam Wildavsky
• [blml] New Rules vs Old   Adam Wildavsky
• [blml] irrelevant   Collins Williams
• [blml] concession   Steve Willner
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Steve Willner
• [blml] L27   Steve Willner
• [blml] L27   Steve Willner
• [blml] L27   Steve Willner
• [blml] L13Db - why artificial?   Steve Willner
• [blml] Law 58B2 revisited   Steve Willner
• [blml] Tartan or Weak   Steve Willner
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Steve Willner
• [blml] concession   Steve Willner
• [blml] concession   Steve Willner
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   Steve Willner
• [blml] LA   Steve Willner
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Steve Willner
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Steve Willner
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options   Steve Willner
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options.   Steve Willner
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options.   Steve Willner
• [blml] Zonal Laws Committees   Steve Willner
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Steve Willner
• [blml] ACTION NEEDED! L27C1   Steve Willner
• [blml] DWS - demonstrating the fallacy?   Steve Willner
• [blml] 40B3?   Steve Willner
• [blml] DWS - internal inconsistencies in lawbook   Steve Willner
• [blml] Two questions (1) footnote to L20B   Steve Willner
• [blml] 2007 Laws - ACBL's options.   Steve Willner
• [blml] irrelevant   Steve Willner
• [blml] LA   Steve Willner
• [blml] When both players are dWSists   Steve Willner
• [blml] Dear DSC: Let's drive s stake through the DWS   Steve Willner
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Gampas at aol.com
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Gampas at aol.com
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Gampas at aol.com
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Gampas at aol.com
• [blml] Correction of a revoke   Gampas at aol.com
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Gampas at aol.com
• [blml] A strory with a conclusion   Gampas at aol.com
• [blml] Unplayable board   Gampas at aol.com
• [blml] Unplayable Board   Gampas at aol.com
• [blml] 40B3? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Correction of a revoke [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] EBU White Book & WBF LC minutes [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Correction of a revoke [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] L86D [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Executive Summary of changes between 1997 Laws and 2007 Laws - Part Two [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Definition of "trick" [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Law 23 (was L13Db - why artificial?) [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] L27 [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Definition of "trick" [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Law 58B2 revisited [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] A story with a conclusion [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]   richard.hills at immi.gov.au
• [blml] Mort post 'em