[blml] Law 27
Alain Gottcheiner
agot at ulb.ac.be
Wed Mar 5 10:44:32 CET 2008
Peter Eidt a écrit :
>> Grattan Endicott> [following address discontinued:
>> grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk]
>> *****************************
>> " It never or rarely happens that a republic
>> or monarchy is well constituted, or its old
>> institutions entirely reformed, unless it is
>> done by only one individual."
>> [Macchiavelli Niccolo' 1469-1527]
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>> +=+ A revision of Law 27 will be released to
>> NBOs and Zones later today. I am unable to
>> attach it here (it would be blocked) but perhaps
>> some recipient has the facilities to copy it as text
>> for the enjoyment of blml-ers. +=+
>>
>
>
> ... and here it comes ... ta-taaaaa
>
>
> 5th March 2008
> Agreed version
>
> Law 27 – INSUFFICIENT BID
>
> A. Acceptance of Insufficient Bid.
>
> 1. Any insufficient bid may be accepted (treated as legal)
> at the option of offender’s LHO. It is accepted if that player calls.
>
> 2. If a player makes an insufficient bid out of rotation Law 31 applies.
>
> B. Insufficient Bid not Accepted.
>
> If an insufficient bid in rotation is not accepted (see A)
> it must be corrected by the substitution of a legal call
> (but see 3 following). Then
>
> 1. (a) if the insufficient bid is corrected by the lowest sufficient bid
>
> in the same denomination and in the Director’s opinion both
> the insufficient bid and the substituted bid are incontrovertibly
> not artificial the auction proceeds without further rectification.
>
> Law 16D does not apply but see D following.
> (b) if, except as in (a), the insufficient bid is corrected with a
> legal
> call that in the Director’s opinion has the same meaning* as,
> or a more precise meaning* than, the insufficient bid (such
> meaning being fully contained within the possible meanings
> of the insufficient bid) the auction proceeds without further
> rectification, but see D following.
>
> 2. except as provided in B1 above, if the insufficient bid is corrected
> by a sufficient bid or by a pass, the offender’s partner must pass
> whenever it is his turn to call. The lead restrictions in Law 26 may
> apply, and see Law 23.
>
> 3. except as provided in B1(b) above, if the offender attempts to
> substitute a double or a redouble for his insufficient bid the
> attempted
> call is cancelled. The offender must replace it as the foregoing
> allows and his partner must then pass whenever it is his turn to
> call.
> The lead restrictions in Law 26 may apply, and see Law 23.
>
> 4. if the offender attempts to replace the one insufficient bid with
> another insufficient bid the Director rules as in 3 if the LHO does
>
> not accept the substituted insufficient bid as A allows.
>
> C. Premature Replacement
>
> If the offender replaces his insufficient bid before the Director
> has ruled on rectification, unless the insufficient bid is accepted
> as A allows the substitution stands. The Director applies the relevant
> foregoing section to the substitution.
>
> D.Non-offending Side Damaged.
>
> If following the application of B1 the Director judges at the end of the
>
> play that without assistance gained through the infraction the outcome
> of the board could well have been different and in consequence the
> non-offending side is damaged (see Law 12B1), he shall award an
> adjusted score. In his adjustment he should seek to recover as nearly
> as possible the probable outcome of the board had the insufficient bid
> not occurred.
>
>
> [footnote: * the meaning of (information available from) a call is the
> knowledge of what it shows and what it excludes. ]
>
>
>
So it's indeed "either the lowest bid in the same denomination, if
natural" as before, or the new provision for bids that tell all that was
told ?
Some esteemed contributors said the former didn't hold anymore.
Best regards
Alain
More information about the blml
mailing list