[blml] Law 27

[Wayne Burrows]

On 05/03/2008, Matthias Berghaus <ziffbridge at t-online.de> wrote:
> Guthrie schrieb:
>
> > [4] *Complex* and unnecessary. I would prefer: you must substitute a
> > pass for an insufficient bid and any inference emanating from the
> > insufficient bid is unauthorised information to the offending side.
> >
>
> Brilliant scheme. Randomising results from those deals by enforcing a
> pass must enhance the enjoyment of the game at least by the factor 100.
> What fun. Everyone else gets a score related to Bridge, while this table
> throws the dice. Why not hold Bridge congresses at the local casino?
>

We already have dice throwing when someone makes and stupid error.

While I am not sure I agree with Nigel's suggestion here I understand
the benefit of having some mechanical rule.

Wayne