[blml] Law 27

[Alain Gottcheiner]

Wayne Burrows a écrit :
> On 05/03/2008, Matthias Berghaus <ziffbridge at t-online.de> wrote:
>   
>> Guthrie schrieb:
>>
>>     
>>> [4] *Complex* and unnecessary. I would prefer: you must substitute a
>>> pass for an insufficient bid and any inference emanating from the
>>> insufficient bid is unauthorised information to the offending side.
>>>
>>>       
AG : illogical. When the IB is in passout seat, you'll have the random 
effect you abhor.

Now, if the laws said : "you must substitute a sufficient bid and any 
inference etc.", the law would surely be less complex, but you have 
understood, I shun laws that replace decisions with UI creation. The new 
L27 is IMOBO a good effort in the right direction.

Best regards

  Alain