[blml] L26 or not

[Peter Eidt]

> ton:
> Interesting question, should be on the agenda for the 2018 laws. It
> seems reasonable to create a connection between L27, 26, 32 and others
> to make UI the decisive factor for rectifications.
> 
> Assume in this example coming from Fearghal that East replaces 4H by
> 5H, showing the same 2 aces. In our new laws West then is allowed to
> make any call, but what about law 26? I am afraid that the lead
> penalties apply, which in my opinion should not be the case. May I
> have your opinion about the idea to combine lead penalties with L27B1:
> if no further rectification in 27B1 then also no lead penalty.
> I you agree you need patience.

I'm patient ;-)

But, should the prase "the auction proceeds without
further rectifications" in L27B1 not be read as "Law 26
will not apply" ??

Peter