[blml] A question of player ability
Alain Gottcheiner
agot at ulb.ac.be
Mon Mar 17 11:01:56 CET 2008
Guthrie a écrit :
> [
>
> Notwithstanding such mitigations, I feel that in some contexts, when the
> expert can advance no logical reason for a successful bid or play that
> is well against the odds, the probability may be overwhelming that an
> infraction has occurred: thus, cases like (2), smack of some kind
> illicit knowledge of the board (perhaps an overheard post-mortem).
One thing upsets me : imagine for one moment that a player has overheard
that 7S was cold and decided to use this information. Would one bid 7S
directly over 1H, thereby provoking all sorts of suspicions, as we see ?
I don't favor this explanation and would like to find some other,
perhaps something like the Rabbit's punitive 4C bid : "how else would
partner let me play in my 8-card suit ?"
Best regards
Alaon
More information about the blml
mailing list