[blml] A question of player ability

Alain Gottcheiner agot at ulb.ac.be
Mon Mar 17 11:01:56 CET 2008


Guthrie a écrit :
> [
>
> Notwithstanding such mitigations, I feel that in some contexts, when the 
> expert can advance no logical reason for a successful bid or play that 
> is well against the odds, the probability may be overwhelming that an 
> infraction has occurred: thus, cases like (2), smack of some kind 
> illicit knowledge of the board (perhaps an overheard post-mortem). 
One thing upsets me : imagine for one moment that a player has overheard 
that 7S was cold and decided to use this information. Would one bid 7S 
directly over 1H, thereby provoking all sorts of suspicions, as we see ? 
I don't favor this explanation and would like to find some other, 
perhaps something like the Rabbit's punitive 4C bid : "how else would 
partner let me play in my 8-card suit ?"

Best regards

   Alaon




More information about the blml mailing list