[blml] 40B3, etc.

[Eric Landau]

On Mar 20, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Alain Gottcheiner wrote:

> Eric Landau a écrit :
>>>
>>>> The point, of course, is that even if you make no explicit  
>>>> agreements
>>>> about RCs after specific IBs, you may be forced by circumstance to
>>>> develop implicit agreements over time.
>>>>
> IBTD. The probability that a honest pair will do the same IB in the  
> same
> context twice in a row is pretty low.

But if it is illegal to have an agreement, then you break the law  
just by having an agreement, regardless of how low the probability of  
your actually exercising it (and, critically, regardless of whether  
you could have avoided it).


Eric Landau
1107 Dale Drive
Silver Spring MD 20910
ehaa at starpower.net