[blml] Law 27 - relay

[Stefanie Rohan]

Eric Landau:

>
> The thread example we have been discussing is 1H-P-1H, corrected to
> 2H (both "incontrovertibly not artificial").  There is nothing new
> here; the relevant portion of the law is the same whether we use TFLB
> from 1963, 1975, 1987, 1997 or 2008.  And Stefanie apparently found
> this example "'misdescriptive and anti-systemic'" by enough to cause
> her to assert that "we can all agree that it is undesirable" (a
> rather strong assertion, since disproven).
>

What is new is that now it is thought by some that the RC 2H bid can be 
natural an non-forcing, game forcing, or who knows what else depending on 
the "meaning" of the IB. I had thought that when such a RC as this was made, 
partner had to treat it as a systemic call.

Stefanie Rohan
London, England