[blml] Law 27B1(b) - 16D exclusion. [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[John (MadDog) Probst]

>
> Yes, I agree that the only sensible way to interpret the 2007 Law 27B1(a)
> statement "Law 16D does not apply but see D following" is that Law 27D
> replaces Law 16.  That is, rather than the test for an adjusted score 
> being
> the severe Law 16 one of avoiding any demonstrably suggested logical
> alternatives, the new test is the less severe Law 27D one of the probable
> outcome had the insufficient bid (and its demonstrable suggestion) not
> occurred.

ok. I've once again concluded I do know how the new 27 works, and happily 
have decided that DALB and I can't cheat like hell.  Good thing too. My 
initial reaction to the first version was "Good idea". My reaction to the 
reworded version is "Still good idea and a bit clearer".  Sufficiently 
clear.  John
>
> Ton Kooijman:
>
>>I can't believe David really saying that in England after 1H - 1H (2H) the
>>1H bidder  with a 13 point hand is barred. If he persists I have to ask
> Max.
>
"Make it good dearie". I'll get opener if he treats it as anything but 6-9 
ish  under 27D.