[blml] Law 64B7

[John (MadDog) Probst]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Harald Skjæran" <harald.skjaran at gmail.com>
To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at amsterdamned.org>
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] Law 64B7


snip regarding the revoke Law that goes to 64C if both sides revoke.

>> >>
>> +=+ Well, the fact is that the item was discussed in
>> some detail and, with varying degrees of enthusiasm
>> among the DSC members, it was agreed that tricks
>> passing to and fro on the same board should be avoided.
>>        By the way, I understood that you would decide
>> whether the revoke was established when first called to
>> the table; I had thought under the 1997 code you would
>> leave the nature of the penalty to the end of the hand.
>
> I guess John meant that he'd inform the players as to the nature of
> the penalty when called. As a TD should. A revoker not winning the
> revoke trick should be informed at that time that the penalty might
> vary according to him later winning a trick or not with a card that
> could lawfully have been played to the revoke trick.
>

Yes, thanks Harald. I'll tell them now how the Law will be applied at the 
end of the hand. John

> -- 
> Kind regards,
> Harald Skjæran
>
>>                                     ~ Grattan ~   +=+
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> blml mailing list
>> blml at amsterdamned.org
>> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
>>
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
>