[blml] Law 64B7

[Robert Frick]

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 10:36:51 -0400, ton <t.kooyman at worldonline.nl> wrote:

>
>  I decided to read every word of every change last night closely and  
> wearing
>
> a "probst cheat" hat. Previously I just skimmed through picking off the  
> odd
> point or two. I must confess I thought I'd understood 27, but now I'm  
> again
> not sure. DALB is beginning to convince me we can cheat like hell. John
>
> ton:
> Yes there are nice examples available to illustrate that possibility (of
> cheating). But that becomes clear immediately and we have L23 or worse to
> handle it.
>
> ton

If the rectification for the first revoke is going to be one trick, and  
the Probst cheat (am I using that term right?) finds a revoke that gains  
two tricks.....Law 23 kicks in, but it will be work for the director to  
detect that situation.