[blml] club director torment

[Robert Frick]

Sorry, a better word would have been supportive, and a better example  
would have been the law about two revokes on the same board. The director  
reads the rules fives times and then decides that an established revoke  
and an unestablished revoke cancel each other out and there is no  
rectification. I would like to be supportive of that director even though  
I know that ruling wasn't what was intended.

I think the people here mostly are that way.


>
> --- Robert Frick \ wrote:
>
>> Meanwhile, new
>> laws....if a player makes an
>> insufficient bid, shoots out a contract barring
>> partner, and gets a top
>> because of a 5-0 spade break, then the director
>> adjusts using 27D, who on
>> this list is going to support that director? My
>> worry is that I will be
>> the only one.
>>
> This is a toughie. We are all so used to the idea of
> an IBer taking a bash at the final contract and
> winning or losing thereby. It always seemed so fair.
>
> However, 27D seems pretty clear about the matter, so I
> will support that director with you.
>
> Stefanie Rohan
> London, England
>
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml