[blml] Vitold's Law 27 concerns.

[Peter Eidt]

From: Herman De Wael <hermandw at skynet.be>
> Have we dealt with the L26 implications?
> The IB is still a retracted bid - which showed some suits. Does the TD
> not imply by giving certain types of L26 rulings what the intention
> was? 

The itself deals with L26 implications:
If the RC fits L27B1 (a or b) there are no L26 restrictions.
If the RC does not fir L27B1 the L26 restrictions are mentioned.

The IB does not show anything. Most of the time
the IBer meant a (some) suit(s) while making
the IB, but it is forbidden by law to give a particular
meaning to the IB.

Peter